|
|
|
Kathleen Flake
Assistant Professor of American Religious History
Paper Grading Standards
Please
don't hesitate to contact me or the writing tutor
if you have questions about
these standards.
"A"
Range
-
The
thesis of the paper goes beyond what was said in class.
-
The
relevance of the topic to the course as a whole is explicit
-
Most
appropriate evidence is used.
-
Contrary
evidence is considered and refuted.
-
Entire
argument clearly supports the thesis
-
All
the elements of the paper are clearly related to the thesis "
Sound organization and assigned length.
-
Few,
if any, mechanical mistakes.
-
Clear,
unambiguous sentences.
-
An
identifiable authorial voice that has a point of view and a sense
of its audience.
"B"
Range
-
Original
thesis, but not well-connected to the question being considered in
the paper.
-
Evidence
is appropriate to the argument
-
Some
contrary evidence is considered and refuted. "
-
Competent,
but superficial analysis.
-
Argument
is generally related to the thesis
-
In
excess of the assigned length.
-
Some
minor mechanical errors but no major ones
-
Likely stylistic weakness may include wordiness and unclear transitions.
-
"C" Range
-
Thesis
is obvious or general
-
Evidence
is only vaguely related to argument.
-
Contrary
evidence is ignored.
-
Examples
are given for their own sake or to prove that the writer has read
the text, not to prove a point.
-
Evidence
is stated but not analyzed to show relation to argument.
-
Argument
within a paragraph may be clear but overall structure is not or overall
structure is clear but the argument in paragraphs is not.
-
Less
than the assigned length.
-
Organization
rambles or disappears.
-
Words
are misused.
-
Proofreading
is weak.
Unacceptable
Papers:
"D"
Range
-
No
coherent thesis. " Evidence is not related to argument.
-
Evidence
is misinterpreted.
-
Evidence
is not cited adequately.
-
Arguments
are not related to thesis.
-
Significant
grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
"F"
Range
-
No
thesis.
-
No
evidence is used.
-
Sources
of evidence are not given.
-
Points
are asserted without argument.
-
Paper
is not intelligible.
|
|